Proof of stake vs Proof of work: PROs, CONs & Differences

To validate transactions and secure the network, cryptocurrency relies on consensus algorithms. Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) are two of the most common consensus algorithms (PoS). In this article, we’ll look at what PoW and PoS are, how they work, and what their benefits and drawbacks are.

No time to read the full article? Click >Here< to jump to the summary

Proof of stake vs Proof of work PROs, CONs & Differences

What are PoW and PoS Consensus algorithms

Proof of Work (PoW) is the original consensus algorithm in use by Bitcoin and many other cryptocurrencies. Miners compete in a PoW system by solving complex mathematical problems to verify transactions and generate new blocks. Miners who find the solution first receive block rewards and transaction fees.


Proof of Stake (PoS) enables validators to “stake” or lock up their money while validating transactions and generating new blocks depending on their holdings. To determine which validators are chosen to create new blocks, stake size and a random selection method are used. The transaction fees are then paid to the validators.

Advantages and disadvantages of PoW

The Advantages of PoW

One of the most significant advantages of PoW is its high security. It is difficult to penetrate the network or manipulate transactions because it is difficult to solve the mathematical problems required to create a new block. PoW also ensures that each miner has an equal chance of participating in the validation process and receiving rewards.

The disadvantages of PoW

One of the disadvantages of PoW is that it consumes a lot of energy. The mining process consumes a significant amount of electricity, which may be harmful to the environment. PoW is also less scalable than PoS, which means that as the network grows, it may be unable to handle the increasing volume of transactions.

Overview Advantages and disadvantages of PoW


  • High security

    The network is secure because the effort required to attack it is very high.

  • Decentralized

    No single entity has control over the network, making it difficult to manipulate.

  • Widely adopted

    PoW is the most well-known consensus mechanism and is used by many cryptocurrencies.

  • Energy consumption

    Although energy consumption is a disadvantage, it can also be seen as an advantage since it provides security and ensures that the network is decentralized.


  • Energy consumption

    PoW requires a lot of energy, which is a major concern for environmentalists.

  • Centralization risk

    The largest mining pools can control the majority of the network, leading to centralization.

  • Cost of maintenance

    Running a miner requires specialized hardware and a lot of electricity, making it expensive.

  • Slow transaction processing speed

    PoW can take a long time to process transactions, making it less suitable for everyday use.

Advantages and disadvantages of PoS

Advantages of PoS

One of the primary advantages of PoS is that it is energy-efficient. Because it does not require mining, it uses less electricity than PoW. PoS is also more scalable than PoW, so it can handle more transactions as the network grows.

Disadvantages of PoS

One of the primary disadvantages of PoS is the possibility of centralization. Because validation is based on stake size, the validators with the highest stakes have the most influence on the network. As a result, the network may be more vulnerable to intrusion and manipulation.

Overview Advantages and disadvantages of PoS


  • Energy efficient

    PoS requires much less energy compared to PoW, making it more environmentally friendly.

  • Scalable

    PoS can handle a much larger number of transactions compared to PoW, making it more suitable for everyday use.

  • Reduced centralization risk

    PoS reduces the risk of centralization by ensuring that validators are selected randomly and have a stake in the network.

  • Lower cost of maintenance

    Running a validator requires only a small amount of money, making it more accessible to the average person.


  • Security

    PoS is less secure compared to PoW since it is less energy intensive and does not require as much computational power.

  • Investment requirement

    To participate in PoS, an individual must hold a certain amount of the cryptocurrency, which can be a barrier to entry.

  • Limited adaptability

    PoS is less flexible compared to PoW, making it harder to implement changes and upgrades.

Advantages and disadvantages of PoS

A. Energy efficiency

Proof of Work (PoW) is well known for needing large amounts of electricity in order to solve complex mathematical problems. Proof of Stake (PoS) uses significantly less energy because validators are selected at random to approve transactions based on the stakes they hold.

Because of the significant energy consumption required to maintain the network, POW’s high energy consumption has a negative impact on the environment. High carbon emissions from energy use contribute to environmental degradation.

PoS systems, on the other hand, are better for the environment because they use less energy and emit less carbon. As a result, many people believe that PoS is a more long-term viable cryptocurrency solution.

B. Scalability

As the number of transactions increases, PoW can become slow and inefficient. Because it does not require intensive computational power, PoS can handle more transactions per second. As a result, PoS becomes a more scalable solution for blockchain networks.

C. Centralization risk

PoW is vulnerable to centralization because the network is controlled by those with the most computational power. The network is more decentralized in PoS because validators are chosen based on the amount of stake they hold, lowering the risk of centralization.

D. Security

Because PoW uses cryptographic hash functions, a bad attacker has a more hard time manipulating the network. As PoW demands a considerable amount of computational power and energy, controlling the majority of the network becomes more difficult. However, if a single entity controls the majority of the mining power on the network, the network is still vulnerable to 51% attacks. PoS is not as vulnerable to 51% attacks as it does not rely on computational power for consensus. In a PoS network, validators are randomly selected to validate transactions and create new blocks. The level of centralization in a PoS system, on the other hand, can have an impact on its security, as a concentration of stake can lead to a concentration of power. Overall PoW is more secure if the network is large enough.

E. Transaction processing speed

PoW is known for its slow transaction processing speed due to the time required to solve complex mathematical problems. Slower processing speeds can result in longer confirmation delays and higher transaction fees.

In terms of transaction processing speed, PoS networks are generally faster and more efficient. This is because validators are chosen at random and do not require intensive calculations, allowing for faster and more frequent block production.

F. Network Costs

PoW mechanisms are expensive to maintain since they require a large amount of energy and computational power. Higher user fees may result from the high cost of electricity and equipment, making network participation difficult for smaller players.

PoS systems, on the other hand, have lower maintenance costs because they do not necessitate complex calculations or a large amount of energy. This could result in lower user fees and make it easier for small players to participate.

G. Adaptability to changing network conditions

PoW mechanisms can be slow to respond to changes, for example; an increase in user count or a change in network conditions. Slow adaptation can result in longer confirmation wait times and slower transaction processing.

PoS systems, on the other hand, are designed to be more adaptable to changing network conditions. The use of network-generated random validators allows for faster adaptation to changes and, as a result, a more efficient network.

H. Flexibility to implement upgrades and changes

Due to the need for consensus among miners, PoW systems can be inflexible and slow to implement upgrades and changes. Delays in incorporating new features and improvements can occur as a result of the slow implementation process.

PoS systems, on the other hand, are more adaptable and capable of implementing upgrades and changes more quickly. The use of validators drawn at random from the network enables fast and relatively secure decision making.

Ethereum and its switch to PoS

Ethereum used Proof of Work (PoW) consensus algorithm until recently when it switched to Proof of Stake (PoS).

The switch to PoS

The switch to PoS is was of Ethereum’s ongoing efforts to improve its network’s efficiency and scalability. The PoS consensus algorithm reduced the energy consumption of the network and increased its ability to handle more transactions.

The benefits of the switch to PoS for Ethereum

The switch to PoS provides several benefits for Ethereum, including increased energy efficiency, improved scalability, and the intention of reduced centralization risk. This makes the network more secure and user-friendly, making it an attractive option for crypto traders, investors, and users. There are however people that argue that more centralization risks will be derived from the switch, as it’s easier for institutions to hold large sums of cryptocurrency rather than sustain large scale mining operations

Solana and Cardano

Solana is a scalable and fast blockchain network that employs the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm. Decentralized applications prefer the network because it is designed to handle a high volume of transactions (dApps). Cardano is a blockchain platform with a consensus algorithm based on Proof of Stake (PoS). The platform’s primary goal is to provide cryptocurrency users, investors, and traders with access to a secure and long-lasting blockchain solution.


Solana and Cardano both use PoS as their consensus algorithm, making them efficient and scalable blockchain network solutions. Because it is designed to handle a higher volume of transactions, Solana is a better choice for dApps. Cardano, on the other hand, is focused on providing a secure and long-term blockchain solution for cryptocurrency traders, investors, and users.

In Summary

Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) are two most utilized consensus algorithms to ecure crypto networks. PoW is widely recognized as being more secure yet inefficient and slow, whereas PoS is more efficient and scalable but brings more security risks. Both PoW and PoS have advantages and disadvantages, making it difficult to decide which is better for cryptocurrencies. It is determined by the blockchain network’s specific needs and goals. For example, if the goal is to handle a high volume of transactions, PoS may be a better choice, whereas PoW may be a better option for providing a secure and long-term solution. Important to note is that many PoW supporters believe that PoW energy consumption is exaggerated.


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on telegram

DEX aggregator

DEX aggregators are financial protocols that enable cryptocurrency traders to access a wide range of trading pools via a single platform. On trading platforms you can select the desired trading